Six keys to punting success – part 6

David Duffield

In the final instalment in this series, today I will discuss betting with ratings. As a long-term professional punter this is obviously a subject I feel well qualified to talk about.

There are many ways to implement ratings and the approach you take really depends on the individual. If the rated markets are framed to a percentage of less than 100 (say 95%) it means is that if you were actually able to secure the rated price on each runner to collect $100 then you would be spending $95 and showing a profit of $5. If you secured overlays the profit margin will be even greater.

Of course it is most unlikely that you will experience a 95% market, even if you shopped particularly well securing the best prices offered amongst bookmakers, Betfair and best tote. In saying that, markets of less than 100% can occur very occasionally and when it does you are in a win/win situation for no matter what the result of the race is, you will make a profit.

In a normal 100%+ market you need to formulate a plan as to how you intend to invest into each race and that plan will differ from race to race. Let’s say in a particular event with nine runners the assessed chance of each horse (in a market framed to 95%) was as follows.

Assessed 95% Bet req’d to collect $100 Actual Market

  1. $2.50 $40 $2.30
  2. $4.00 $25 $4.50
  3. $10.00 $10 $7.50
  4. $12.00 $8.50 $16
  5. $20.00 $5 $12
  6. $25.00 $4 $16
  7. $40.00 $2.50 $25 $95.00

In the above race the two horses that are over the odds are #2 and #4. One strategy would be to back them both to win a percentage of your starting bank, which for the sake of this exercise is $100. The bets would be $25 and $8.50 win on #2 and #4 respectively.

Get started

We’re here to help you with betting success.

Join today

If #2 wins the collect will be $112.50 and if #4 wins $136.00. The area that many punters have difficulty understanding is that in a situation like the one above you should not be backing the top-rated horse. While it is assessed as having the best chance of winning the race, it is not a value bet at the available odds.

Rated at $2.50 it’s chance of winning is 40%, so over 100 races it is expected to salute 40 times. Taking unders at $2.30 will return only $92 per win x 100 races = $3680. The outlay of $40 x 100 races is $4000 so over a period of 100 races you can expect to lose $320.

Alternatively the chance of # 2 winning is 25% (calculated by dividing it’s rated price into 100). So over 100 races the outlay would be $25 x 100 = $2500. The return would be $112.50 x 25 which is $2812.50. This leaves a profit of $312.50 less the amount invested on # 4.

This is the principle behind obtaining value and it is no different to the example used of trying to get odds of more than $2 about a coin toss. Securing overs does not mean the horse will win, nor does it mean the horse has a better chance of winning. More importantly though, it means that in the long run you will win.

In the short-term you will experience losing bets and losing runs, but by combining a consistent staking plan with a disciplined approach you will end up with a positive result.

Previous articles in this series covered the following topics:

  1. Unrealistic expectations
  2. You will experience losing periods
  3. Probability will affect your bank
  4. Understanding market percentages
  5. Discipline is the key
About the Author

David Duffield provides horse racing tips, ratings, lay betting and sports tips that will help you turn into a winning punter.

Share this post

Related articles

Back to all articlesResources